Up to 24 More T901 Engines Would Stay on the Development Contract
An August notice outlines a possible expansion of GE’s development contract. A separate production effort would carry the engine into fielding with its support system attached.
September 26, 2026 | 4 min brief
REDSTONE ARSENAL, Alabama (September 26, 2026) — The Army is weighing up to 24 more T901 engines on its development contract before it commits to production. Army Contracting Command-Redstone outlined the plan in an August 25 notice to industry, proposing a noncompetitive modification to GE Aerospace's existing contract.
A separate August 14 notice asks industry what T901 production would require. Both efforts are moving on a program the Army zeroed out of its FY2027 request after Congress added funding in FY2026.
Modern Warfighter's August 23 analysis, "The Engine That Outlived Its Own Program," examined T901's survival and Black Hawk's lead in integration. The two August notices take the program a step further. The engine notice would keep more hardware inside development. The production notice begins defining what fielding the engine would require.
MORE ENGINES BEFORE PRODUCTION
The engine notice calls the proposed hardware "T901 Series (YT Rated Engines)" and places it under GE's engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) contract, W58RGZ-19-C-0003. ACC-Redstone intends to support what the notice calls a limited source justification and approval under FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), stating that the work is available only from GE.
The notice caps the quantity at 24. Its text states no price or schedule and does not define YT Rated. The contract vehicle carries the clearer signal. These would be development-contract engines, separate from any production lot.
Qualification work is already scheduled. The Army plans engine airworthiness qualification alongside UH-60M developmental testing, with flight-load surveys and further flight testing beginning in the first quarter of FY2027 and an operational assessment planned for FY2028. That work provides a plausible use for more development hardware, although the Army has not publicly assigned the proposed 24 engines to it.
Black Hawk integration already has funded work behind it. A July 30 Department of War contract announcement records a $49,929,599 modification, P00027, to Sikorsky contract W58RGZ-22-C-0063 for UH/HH-60M integration and qualification, with work in Stratford, Connecticut, through June 30, 2030. GAO's July 2 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment places Black Hawk integration and qualification before production starts, with Apache's completion afterward.
PRODUCTION IS A SEPARATE EFFORT
The production notice describes more than an engine buy. It names Middle Tier Acquisition as the intended pathway, with a scope running from testing through production and installation, including engine integration. The support package covers spares and shipping containers, special tooling and support equipment, interim contractor logistics support, depot maintenance work requirements, field-service representatives and training.
The effort would run 60 months from award, with production deliveries beginning no later than 2031 and ending by 2033. Production engines under that effort would support First Unit Equipped/First Unit Issued activities. The Army is asking industry how to install the engine, supply it, maintain it and support the units receiving it.
The schedule before those deliveries is still unsettled. On September 4, GE told Aviation Week that airworthiness qualification remained targeted for late 2027 and that preliminary discussions concerned potential procurement in 2028. In April, Breaking Defense reported that Army leaders expected Black Hawk qualification to finish in 2028.
GAO says the Army delayed production start to FY2029, with the low-rate decision in the April–June 2029 quarter. Those company-reported 2028 procurement discussions would precede GAO's published low-rate decision.
CONGRESS IS FUNDING THE BRIDGE
The Army's FY2027 request lists zero discretionary RDT&E funding for the Improved Turbine Engine Program. Lawmakers added $175 million in FY2026 appropriations and $63 million through the 2025 reconciliation law.
That money keeps development going for now. FY2026 RDT&E funds remain available for obligation through September 2027. The continuing resolution signed September 2 holds FY2026 rates through December 11. The engine notice text identifies no funding source for the 24 engines.
FY2027 is still open. House authorization text includes $100 million, and House appropriators proposed $155 million. The two are separate House positions, and the appropriations bill is the one that would provide budget authority.
ITEP funding against two zero-dollar Army requests.
Source: U.S. Army, U.S. Congress, Breaking Defense
WHAT THE ARMY IS PRESERVING
GAO reported that program officials said GE and Sikorsky would have stopped T901 work in 2026 without additional funding. Congress kept the effort moving. More development engines would extend that continuity through qualification.
GAO also reported that GE anticipated cost overruns. According to the Army, turnover in subject-matter expertise contributed to rework of engine hardware and associated documentation. Additional engines could keep that expertise engaged and expose manufacturing problems before production quantities grow.
Continuity carries a dependency. The engine notice acknowledges an incomplete technical data package and seeks at least government purpose rights. That gap keeps the Army reliant on GE for work that depends on data only GE holds. Broader rights to a complete package could widen the Army's options for future competition and government-performed maintenance.
The next funded modification will show how many development engines the Army buys. The production contract will show how much control the Army secures over the data and support structure behind the fleet.
RELATED COVERAGE
VERIFICATION: The source record behind this analysis, including what could not be confirmed. VIEW VERIFICATION →
TAGGED: T901, ITEP, GE Aerospace, Black Hawk, Apache, Army Aviation, Acquisition
-

ANDRES CARDENAS | Lead Analyst
Modern Warfighter Defense Publication
/ STAY CONNECTED /